KAMPALA, UGANDA | The Katanga murder trial, in which Molly Katanga is accused of killing her husband, Henry Katanga, has progressed significantly with a number of issues being brought to light in the prosecution as the defense highlighted inconsistencies in witness testimonies. For over two weeks, the court has seen thorough cross-examinations that have called into question key aspects of the evidence.

Defense counsel Jet Tumwebaze critically examined the testimony of Naomi Nyangweso, the late Henry Katanga’s stepsister and the prosecution’s ninth witness. During cross-examination on October 15, 2024, Tumwebaze focused on Nyangweso’s assertion that her police statements were recorded in Runyankore due to limited English proficiency. To challenge this, Tumwebaze presented evidence of her proficiency in English, citing her responsibilities as the Local Council 1 chairperson in Bugolobi, a role involving regular written communication in English. This discrepancy prompted questions regarding the accuracy of her initial statements.

The defense further scrutinized Nyangweso’s statements, noting differences in signatures on documents recorded on various dates and the absence of a key claim she made during testimony—that Henry had expressed concern that Molly posed a threat to him. Tumwebaze questioned why this significant detail was missing from her written statements, emphasizing its importance. Nyangweso’s explanation, that she had been instructed to remain silent on this matter, added a layer of complexity to her testimony.

In addition to witness testimony, the defense raised issues regarding the forensic evidence presented by police expert Mubiru Andrew. It was revealed that the serial number of the firearm examined did not match the number in the case records. Mubiru maintained that he analyzed the evidence provided to him, but the discrepancy raised questions about the handling and accuracy of evidence.

The defense also introduced items such as a baton and wooden sticks, suggesting that Molly Katanga could have been assaulted rather than being the aggressor. Blood traces found in various parts of the residence were presented as potential indicators of an altercation, offering an alternative perspective to the prosecution’s narrative.

Other witnesses faced credibility challenges, including Ronald Mugabe, who handled documents related to the deceased despite lacking legal credentials. Police officers’ testimonies were similarly scrutinized, with Julius Muhwezi acknowledging that a submitted form appeared altered and Officer Owang admitting to omissions in his report. These revelations contributed to doubts about the thoroughness of the investigation.

The testimony of Timothy Nyangweso, who stated that he informed Henry’s daughter, Martha, about her father’s death by phone, was contradicted by phone records showing no such call. This inconsistency further complicated the prosecution’s case.

The trial has revealed significant areas of concern in the prosecution’s presentation, raising questions about the impact on the overall case. The court has adjourned for a recess, with attention now focused on how these findings will influence the proceedings when they resume.