KAMPALA, Uganda | The Uganda Law Society (ULS) Council members has formally disassociated the institution from the recent remarks made by its President, Isaac Ssemakadde, which have sparked controversy within the legal fraternity and the public. Known for his combative slogan, “Bang the Table,” Ssemakadde’s comments have triggered a backlash from both the public and members of the legal fraternity.
In a statement dated November 19, 2024, signed by ULS Secretary Phillip Munabi, Central Region Representative Turyamusiima Geoffrey, Western Region Representative Samuel Muhumuza, and Northern Region Representative Egaru O. Emmanuel, the Council distanced itself from the President’s remarks. The statement made it clear that Ssemakadde’s comments were made in his personal capacity and do not reflect the values or ideologies of the Uganda Law Society.
“…the said statements are words of Isaac Ssemakadde are solely his personal capacity and are not refelective of the Executive Council of the Uganda Law Society,” the Council members stated.
The letter referenced specific incidents where Ssemakadde allegedly directed offensive remarks at public officials, including Justice Jane Frances Abodo and Attorney General Kiryowa Kiwanuka. It also cited his attacks on Senior Counsel within the ULS, describing such behavior as unacceptable and inconsistent with the Society’s principles.
While the Council disassociated itself from Ssemakadde’s language, some members of the Society have acknowledged the value of the issues he raised. These include concerns about the sanctioning of politically motivated charges and the controversial practice of charging civilians in military courts. While they agree that the choice of words may not have been appropriate, they argue that the underlying issues reflect the core principles the ULS fights for: justice, accountability, and the rule of law.
“These are real and pressing concerns that affect the integrity of our justice system,” one member noted. “While the delivery may have been flawed, the message itself highlights issues that the Uganda Law Society must continue to address.”
The Council, however, emphasized that as duly elected representatives of the membership, they remain committed to maintaining the Society’s image and refraining from personal attacks. Instead, they called for collective focus on the core issues affecting ULS members and the legal profession as a whole.
Comments